Lack of evidence of a clopidogrel-statin interaction in the CHARISMA trial.

نویسندگان

  • Jacqueline Saw
  • Danielle M Brennan
  • Steven R Steinhubl
  • Deepak L Bhatt
  • Koon-Hou Mak
  • Keith Fox
  • Eric J Topol
چکیده

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of clopidogrel and statin interaction in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND There are conflicting data regarding whether statins predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 reduce the metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite and diminish its clinical efficacy. METHODS The CHARISMA trial was a randomized trial comparing long-term 75 mg/day clopidogrel versus placebo in patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors on aspirin. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death at median follow-up of 28 months. We performed a secondary analysis evaluating the interaction of clopidogrel versus placebo with statin administration, categorizing baseline statin use to those predominantly CYP3A4 metabolized (atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin; CYP3A4-MET) or others (pravastatin, fluvastatin; non-CYP3A4-MET). RESULTS Of 15,603 patients enrolled, 10,078 received a statin at baseline (8,245 CYP3A4-MET, 1,748 non-CYP3A4-MET) and 5,496 did not. For the overall population, the primary end point was 6.8% with clopidogrel and 7.3% with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; p = 0.22). This was similar among patients on CYP3A4-MET (5.9% clopidogrel, 6.6% placebo, HR 0.89; p = 0.18) or non-CYP3A4-MET statin (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.2% placebo, HR 0.78; p = 0.19). There was no interaction between statin types and randomized treatment (p = 0.69). Patients on atorvastatin (n = 4,127) (5.7% clopidogrel, 7.1% placebo, HR 0.80; p = 0.06) or pravastatin (n = 1,440) (5.1% clopidogrel, 7.0% placebo, HR 0.72; p = 0.13) had similar event rates. CONCLUSIONS Despite theoretic concerns and ex vivo testing suggesting a potential negative interaction with concomitant clopidogrel and CYP3A4-MET statin administration, there was no evidence of an interaction clinically in a large placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The CAPRIE-like subgroups of CHARISMA: a CAPRIEciously biased analysis of an unCHARISMAtic truth.

In a textbook example of an improper subgroup analysis (1) (one defined by events subsequent to randomization, in this case fabricating new “CAPRIE [Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events]-like” inclusion criteria), Bhatt et al. (2) present data suggesting that persons with a prior history of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or peripheral vascular disease (PVD) may...

متن کامل

Effect of Statin Treatment on COVID-19 Patients’ Outcomes: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Statins may be protective against viral infection and have been suggested for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).  Objective: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin on COVID-19 patients. Methods: Our study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial that constitutes a population of COVID-19 patients admitted to Bu-Ali Sina Hospi...

متن کامل

CHARISMA: the antiplatelet saga continues.

CHARISMA: The Antiplatelet Saga Continues To the Editor: We read with interest the Editorial by Norris and Barnett1 on the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial. They conclude that aspirin is still the first choice in the secondary prevention of stroke, that clopidogrel is only marginally more effective than aspirin in ...

متن کامل

Effect of clopidogrel on the rate and functional severity of stroke among high vascular risk patients: a prespecified substudy of the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Disabling stroke is costly and considered by some patients a fate worse than death. We aimed to determine whether clopidogrel reduces the rate and functional severity of stroke among high vascular risk patients, including patients with previous transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke, who were enrolled in the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic St...

متن کامل

Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CHARISMA trial.

OBJECTIVE To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel plus aspirin (C + A) compared with aspirin (A) alone during the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial from a US payer perspective. BACKGROUND Although the CHARISMA trial did not find a benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin in its overall study ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

دوره 50 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007